Super Troopers 3 (2026) movie poster featuring the five original troopers in uniform with mustaches, plus new cast members, against a Vermont highway backdrop

Comedy · Review

Super Troopers 3 (2026)

The mustache rides, again. Again.

R 1h 40m Aug 6, 2026 EnglishDir. Jay Chandrasekhar
ComedyCrimeMystery

Audience Score

5.9 / 10

InfiniteBrief

5.8 / 10

Readers

/ 5

Rate

Top Cast

Trailer

Synopsis

Vermont's favorite highway patrolmen return when Farva (Kevin Heffernan) announces his engagement to Sarita (Hannah Simone), the sister of his longtime rival Thorny (Jay Chandrasekhar). Horrified, Thorny schemes to derail the wedding while the squad simultaneously investigates a potent new drug circulating near the Canadian border. As the nuptials approach and the case intensifies, the troopers clash with Spurbury PD's new leadership and confront the question of whether their brand of chaotic policing still fits a changing world.

With the original quintet back in uniform and new faces on both sides of the law, Super Troopers 3 blends wedding-comedy chaos with a procedural backbone — though the two strands rarely intertwine as cleverly as the premise suggests.

Super Troopers 3: The Mustache Rides Into Familiar Territory

Super Troopers 3 arrives eighteen years after the original cult classic and eight since the uneven sequel, reuniting the full Broken Lizard troupe for one more shift at the Vermont border. Jay Chandrasekhar directs from a script credited to all five members, and the result feels exactly like what it is: a comedy written by middle-aged men revisiting characters they created in their thirties. The chemistry remains the film's greatest asset — Chandrasekhar's deadpan Thorny, Kevin Heffernan's explosive Farva, Steve Lemme's cocksure Mac, Paul Soter's straight-man Foster, and Erik Stolhanske's eager Rabbit still ping off each other with the rhythm of a long-running improv team. When the movie simply lets them riff in the station house or on traffic stops, it recaptures the loose, shaggy charm that made the first film stick.

New Blood, Old Habits

The premise — Farva's engagement to Thorny's sister Sarita (Hannah Simone, game but underused) — promises personal stakes the franchise hasn't really attempted before. Thorny's sabotage campaign should fuel character comedy, but the script too often defaults to gross-out set pieces and callback jokes that feel obligatory rather than inspired. Nat Faxon's Captain Markowski and Chace Crawford's Baker add fresh friction as Spurbury PD antagonists, while Andrew Dismukes' rookie Coy provides a gen-Z foil the writers don't fully know what to do with. The drug-ring mystery runs parallel to the wedding chaos, but the two threads never meaningfully intersect; the crime plot exists mostly to justify the runtime and give the troopers something to "solve" in the third act. At 100 minutes, the film is lean, yet several sequences — a prolonged mead-hall bender, a surveillance montage — overstay their welcome.

Who's This For?

Fans who quote "meow" and "liter of cola" will find enough callbacks and recurring bits to justify a watch. Newcomers will wonder why this warranted a theatrical release in 2026. The R rating is earned — profanity, nudity, and drug humor abound — but the transgressive edge that made the original feel dangerous has softened into nostalgia act. Chandrasekhar directs with competent invisibility; the film looks fine, moves briskly, and never pretends to be more than a reunion special with a budget. Your enjoyment correlates directly with how much you want to see these specific guys do these specific bits one more time.

Pros

  • Original cast chemistry remains effortless and lived-in
  • Lean 100-minute runtime avoids bloat
  • Nat Faxon and Chace Crawford add welcome new energy
  • Several standalone gags land with genuine surprise

Cons

  • Wedding sabotage and drug plot feel like separate movies
  • Hannah Simone's character is wasted as a plot device
  • Over-reliance on callbacks and gross-out retreads
  • Third-act resolution is perfunctory and unearned

Verdict

A harmless but inessential reunion that coasts on chemistry and callbacks. Die-hards will smile; everyone else will forget it by the credits.

Reader Rating

/ 5

Be the first to rate this movie

Write a Review

Sign in to share what you thought — star ratings above need no account.

Frequently Asked

Is Super Troopers 3 worth watching?

If you're a devoted fan of the first two films, yes — the core quintet's rapport is intact and there are enough laughs to justify a viewing. Casual viewers or newcomers can safely skip it.

What is Super Troopers 3 about?

Farva's engagement to Thorny's sister triggers a sabotage campaign, while the troopers investigate a cross-border drug ring. The two storylines run parallel but rarely intersect meaningfully.

Is Super Troopers 3 suitable for kids?

No. The film is rated R for pervasive strong language, sexual content, graphic nudity, drug use, and crude humor throughout. It is not appropriate for children or young teens.

Do I need to see the previous Super Troopers movies first?

Yes. The film assumes deep familiarity with the characters, running gags, and dynamics established in the 2001 original and 2018 sequel. Many jokes are direct callbacks that won't land without context.

Who directed Super Troopers 3?

Jay Chandrasekhar, who also directed the first two films and stars as Thorny. The screenplay is credited to all five Broken Lizard members: Chandrasekhar, Kevin Heffernan, Steve Lemme, Paul Soter, and Erik Stolhanske.

If you liked this, watch

Super TroopersSuper Troopers 2The Heat21 Jump StreetPineapple ExpressHot Fuzz

Movie data provided by TMDB. This product uses the TMDB API but is not endorsed or certified by TMDB.